17 ms·
I was doing serverless pages back in late 90s when I uploaded PHP scripts to "website providers".
by xtracto 6y ago
I was doing serverless pages back in late 90s when I uploaded PHP scripts to "website providers".
- themarkers 6y agotrue serverless
- dividedbyzero 6y agoWhy "true"? I don't have to worry about servers and infrastructure with Lambdas either.
- fxleach 6y agoNow those are called "cloud" servers (gasps, awe)...
- fxleach 6y agoWhy are you booing me? I'm right.
- adrianpike 6y agooriginal lambda
- intergalplan 6y ago"Your function runs from scratch on each request, with some intelligent caching for performance reasons." Gestures at LAMP and PHP-FPM
- benbristow 6y agoDifferent thing though. When you uploaded your PHP script, you uploaded it to a single server, and it ran on a single server. Unless your provider were doing some kind of load balancing (doubt it). With serverless you upload your 'script' to the 'cloud' and then it will run on any number of servers, usually assigned to one when it dry-runs. Then it'll unload from the server afterwards. And therefore unless you have a bottleneck (like a database server) then you can essentially scale as far as the cloud will let you.
- innocenat 6y agoScaling: upload file to another server.
- asperous 6y agoAt least with Mediatemple’s shared hosting, they had a “grid” service that would host your site on a cluster of servers and claimed to be able to handle large bursts of traffic. It worked because each page request ran a complete cgi php script to generate the page view and then terminated. There was no long running server.
- disgrunt 6y agoIt worked. But I remember Media Temple being slower than their competition. Seemed to have to pay a performance penalty for the "grid".