2 ms·
Hello! I'm currently using Heroku and exploring a switch due to technical limitations with Heroku. My team is evaluating porter versus alternatives like Qovery
by mushufasa 5y ago
Hello! I'm currently using Heroku and exploring a switch due to technical limitations with Heroku.
My team is evaluating porter versus alternatives like Qovery and Skaffold. What is your pitch on Porter versus other attempts to replicate the magic of Heroku with kubernetes on a directly controlled cloud?
- sungrokshim 5y agoSkaffold is a bit different from Porter and Qovery because it's mostly a tool for development on Kubernetes, and its primary goal isn't to make deployments as easy as Heroku on k8s. I describe this in more detail in the comment above, but I would say the biggest difference between Porter and Qovery is that we intend to make Porter a platform that accommodates not only those seeking the magic of Heroku in their own cloud, but also the devops engineers who want to customize and "opt-in" to be exposed to the underlying complexity of k8s. Please give the above comment a look and lmk if you have any lingering q's.
- evoxmusic 5y agoHi - thank you for asking - I am Romaric, Co-founder of Qovery. Give a try to both product and pick the one is best for you. Porter and Qovery respond to two different purposes. Qovery offers a free plan for individual developer and a generous business plan (free up to 10 apps). Have a good day. Romaric
- jusrhee 5y agoYup, we don't plan to support a fully-hosted alternative to something like Heroku/Render where your applications run on our cloud.