3 ms·
I see. So you're saying if he did really only have 5k to his name, that family member wouldn't have gotten any help from him and could have died. But hey, he'
by j_baker 15y ago
I see. So you're saying if he did really only have 5k to his name, that family member wouldn't have gotten any help from him and could have died. But hey, he'd have been in the right though, wouldn't he have? That's what's important after all. The family member's concerns are only secondary.
- burgerbrain 15y agoHe certainly wouldn't be in the wrong. 5k won't get you anything as far as medical care in the US goes. If he were unable to do anything, how could he possibly be in the wrong for not doing anything? He could have continued to pretend like he only had 5k, and like someone with only that much money been unable to do a thing, but then he would be wrong. What he did was not, and what anyone else would have had to do wouldn't be either.
- j_baker 15y agoAgreed. Dead family members are ok as long as you can't be blamed for their deaths.
- burgerbrain 15y agoClearly you are being purposely dense.