I would like to see this situation playing out when someone uber confident would keep going at the topic questioning her and bringing good counter-examples, dat

I would like to see this situation playing out when someone uber confident would keep going at the topic questioning her and bringing good counter-examples, data examples. Also bringing out those 2 folks they lost as an argument for example. Ask her that you tried to Google, but only found data pointing at WFH being more productive, and whether she could help them out by pointing out to the "correct" study that was done. Make sure to bring out all the cons of not allowing WFH very eloquently. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/15259-working-from-home-more-productive.html#:~:text=Working%20From%20Home%20Increases%20Productivity&text=According%20to%20one%20study%2C%20remote,weeks%20of%20work%20per%20year https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/15259-working-from-home-mo.... One of my weird "fantasies" is to be at a level of net worth where I don't care at all about firing and have confidence to question bad attitudes or practices of the authority and see how they would handle it when I know that I'm in the right. Not out of maliciousness, but for the benefit of the company and everyone working there. Anyway this is a big motivator for me to save a lot of my net worth and also develop as strong debate skills as I possibly can with a charismatic and witty personality. I'm far from there, but I'm training myself. Although in this case, looking deeper at the topic, I should also be sure that studies would be by my side since for instance this study done before Covid 19 https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/atus.pdf prefers working from office. So in conclusion the situation is probably not as black and white and may end up in her favour still.