4 ms·
It has to be encoded somehow. Maybe not a rate. It can't be "amplitude modulated" because in general signals are pulses. So it's kind-of digital. It sometim
by philipswood 5y ago
It has to be encoded somehow.
Maybe not a rate.
It can't be "amplitude modulated" because in general signals are pulses.
So it's kind-of digital.
It sometimes can't be a pulse rate encoded signal due to frequency cutoffs.
As far as I understand they've identified several different encoding schemes and will probably find several more.
- candiodari 5y agoYes it is encoded. Essentially the rate of firing for a neuron encodes an exponential value to be represented. This is called "spike trains". You can see this clearly if you do an extreme slowdown of a human movement. Then, suddenly, what looks like a smooth movement, like raising an arm (and because of inertia it is smoothed of course), isn't really smooth. A pulse arrives in the muscle, and there is 20ms where the muscle is tensioned, and then it's back to neutral for 100ms. Then another spike arrives, another 20ms where a lot of tension is put on the muscle, the movement accelerates, and the muscle goes back to neutral. It's not a continuous movement at all. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_neuron_model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_neuron_model But odds are good that it's not just the value that's encoded. Many experiments have shown that it matters a lot if the signals are in phase (ie. they encode the same or some multiple of a value, but that the signals started at the exact same time matters, maybe more than the value itself. Or in the encoding: while for the value only the distance between 2 spikes matters, if 2 spikes on 2 different neurons occur at the exact same time, this will be interpreted as very relevant, even those both spikes may have very different firing rates)