This is a relatively deep look into the bottomless task of considering a candiate for a role in an organization. It bears multiple readings. It suggests that y

This is a relatively deep look into the bottomless task of considering a candiate for a role in an organization. It bears multiple readings. It suggests that you may not learn much from interviews with the candidate, and may learn much more from face to face interviews with their references. It encourages the reader to seek both the genius and dysfunction of every person (candidates and references), for each context they've worked in. (Altho I'd refer to these as their inherent irrationality and ingenuity; dysfunction and genius are the extremes.)