3 ms·

c2 has some interesting thoughts on the topic. https://wiki.c2.com/?KnowledgeRepresentations https://wiki.c2.com/?KnowledgeRepresentations https://wiki.c2.com

• dleslie 6y ago
  How is it that c2 has remained so quality?
  • fiddlerwoaroof 6y ago
    It turned write-only before the Eternal September of wikispam set in
    • hinkley 6y ago
      I am trying to start a wiki project and I have no idea what sort of world of stupidity I’m about to step in to, do I? I had thought of building the history system on top of a theory of patches system would be a nice stretch goal. But it seems to me that having an infinite undo function drastically changes the account creation situation. I only have to be passingly sure you’re not a bot, and I can decide after the fact if you’re approximating a decent human being or not.
      • fiddlerwoaroof 6y ago
        I'm not really sure, I think a fork and merge-request system might be useful? Or requiring registration for all editors. The big issue is figuring out how to reduce the moderation burden to a reasonable amount.
      • mycall 6y ago
        You should consider event sourcing for all given information. Then, you can undo/redo as much as you wish.
    • zeckalpha 6y ago
      Write-only is a great place for spam... no need to read it!
      • fiddlerwoaroof 6y ago
        Oops, I’m going to leave it because it’s funny.
        • chriswarbo 6y ago
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write-only_memory_(joke) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Write-only_memory_(joke)
  • Banana699 6y ago
    It didnt? there is a _lot_ of "no u" arguments on C2