3 ms·
Your interview process is not far from the ones I've been involved in and I think you make a number of compelling points. The onus remains on the hiring folks t
by graerg 5y ago
Your interview process is not far from the ones I've been involved in and I think you make a number of compelling points. The onus remains on the hiring folks to actually put in the work required to follow a sane process. I don't understand why you're blaming these platforms for teams having bad interviewing practices.
There's nothing wrong with hackerrank-esque platforms themselves. They're actually pretty sweet if you want to work through a couple narrowly scoped problems and get instant feedback while picking up a new language. There are even some diamonds in the rough that are actually decent multi-stage problems you can work through with a candidate during an interview. They make data structures and general code literacy more accessible to aspiring programmers, which is not a Bad Thing.
If hiring teams are attempting (and failing miserably) to use these platforms as a shortcut, that's on them. Their system may be busted, but coding sandboxes aren't forcing teams to not put effort into their hiring processes; that's entirely up to the folks making decisions.
- andrew_ 5y ago> I don't understand why you're blaming these platforms for teams having bad interviewing practices. Never said that I did. I said they were the worst thing to happen to tech, and elaborated that it's because of their overuse and abuse in hiring. Many good things start with good intentions and are abused.
- graerg 5y ago> What Hackerrank DOES do is shift the burden of actually caring about the people you're speaking to FWIW, this is what I was keying off of.