4 ms·

Reaper is incredibly powerful, no doubt about it. However, as a long time Ableton and Logic user, I would say that both of those programs have a much better UI/

Reaper is incredibly powerful, no doubt about it. However, as a long time Ableton and Logic user, I would say that both of those programs have a much better UI/UX than Reaper. Personally, I find Ableton more enjoyable to work in, as it has a nice UI and stays out of my way while I work. That’s just my opinion though. In the end of the day, the best DAW is the one that works for you.

TomSwirly 5y ago
I have never hated any program more than I hated Ableton. It's very good for doing 4/4 dance music - simply terrible for anything else. For example, for well over ten years, when you stretched a MIDI track, it would stretch _just the notes_ and leave all the other MIDI information where it was. Which means if you played a performance on any MIDI instrument that has any controllers at all, it's now broken. I reported it to them and I was told that was how it was supposed to work. I asked them for some scenario where this wouldn't break your track, and instead they asked me why wanted to do this. I explained that sometimes I'm a little slow or fast in a track and want to tweak it; but more, I compose by playing freely with the metronome turned off, and then editing the result to match bar lines. They were like, "That's your problem, then, you must always have the metronome on when recording." I said, "But I don't want a metronome. Often I don't even know what tempo I am going to end up in." They said, "You're just trying to be difficult." And I ran into this over and over again. For example, they hyped Max For Live for years, and when it finally came out, it didn't handle system exclusives AND it didn't handle more than one MIDI channel(!) Hundreds of people complained about this, but it still wasn't fixed over five years later. Here's an article I wrote about ten years ago: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sh7fG1cVtjVb5Ml5nYXeew9ckZYqRXApdLqSoU8oaSw/edit#heading=h.24cqokc9u9kp https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sh7fG1cVtjVb5Ml5nYXeew9c...

TomSwirly 5y ago

I have never hated any program more than I hated Ableton. It's very good for doing 4/4 dance music - simply terrible for anything else. For example, for well over ten years, when you stretched a MIDI track, it would stretch _just the notes_ and leave all the other MIDI information where it was. Which means if you played a performance on any MIDI instrument that has any controllers at all, it's now broken. I reported it to them and I was told that was how it was supposed to work. I asked them for some scenario where this wouldn't break your track, and instead they asked me why wanted to do this. I explained that sometimes I'm a little slow or fast in a track and want to tweak it; but more, I compose by playing freely with the metronome turned off, and then editing the result to match bar lines. They were like, "That's your problem, then, you must always have the metronome on when recording." I said, "But I don't want a metronome. Often I don't even know what tempo I am going to end up in." They said, "You're just trying to be difficult." And I ran into this over and over again. For example, they hyped Max For Live for years, and when it finally came out, it didn't handle system exclusives AND it didn't handle more than one MIDI channel(!) Hundreds of people complained about this, but it still wasn't fixed over five years later. Here's an article I wrote about ten years ago: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sh7fG1cVtjVb5Ml5nYXeew9ckZYqRXApdLqSoU8oaSw/edit#heading=h.24cqokc9u9kp https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sh7fG1cVtjVb5Ml5nYXeew9c...