> There's pretty convincing evidence that even human brains tend to make decisions first then rationalize them after. The problem with that is we can't simula

> There's pretty convincing evidence that even human brains tend to make decisions first then rationalize them after. The problem with that is we can't simulate human brains to test the integrity of that rationalization. Assuming the algorithm is repeatable, the data from the rationalization can be used to generate adversarial input from the original that tests the conclusion is actually responding to those factors. At the very least, this would give courts an avenue to validate the algorithms in practice.