2 ms·
We were comparing carbon input to food output, gram for gram. Caloric/nutrient density is completely relevant. You've thrown that basis out the window by addin
by mizzack 5y ago
We were comparing carbon input to food output, gram for gram. Caloric/nutrient density is completely relevant.
You've thrown that basis out the window by adding additional foods and reframing the argument.
- morsch 5y agoAnd yet you have merely restated that caloric density is relevant, not explained why it would be. (Nutrient density wasn't your original point.) Asparagus is not grown or eaten for it's calories.