5 ms·
That approach appears to provide an incentive for employees to leave so they can liquidate their holdings.
by abarth 15y ago
That approach appears to provide an incentive for employees to leave so they can liquidate their holdings.
- sanj 15y agoTrue. So the employee has to believe that those options will be worth more in the future if they stay. That seems like an entirely appropriate challenge for the company.
- bhickey 15y agoNot sure how legally feasible this is... Suppose the (ex-)employee sells the company an option on his options. If he exercises prematurely, the company sits on its option and the employee can't flip the shares onto the secondary market. When the company exercises, the employee is compelled to exercise to cover his position. Figuring out the strike price on the options could be tricky, but it removes the incentive to quit and force the company to scoop the shares.
- nikcub 15y agothat is the reason why it wouldn't work, since the company would provide a ready market for stock that nobody else might buy (not to mention that you have to use company cash) also 'fair market value' is difficult for a private stock
- davidu 15y agoHe defined FMV as 409a valuation, which we all know is a number pulled out of thin air where value > last financing valuation < infinity.