3 ms·
The US is considerably less dense than the UK. We could afford lots more rail in higher density areas, rail to everywhere doesn't make any sense (we have freigh
by maxerickson 6y ago
The US is considerably less dense than the UK. We could afford lots more rail in higher density areas, rail to everywhere doesn't make any sense (we have freight tracks, the part that wouldn't make sense is frequent passenger service).
My county is rural but not that rural and has a density of 12 per km². It's a 2 hour drive to a small city.
- bobthepanda 6y agoWhen we talk about where would rail work there are really only two or three places worth talking about; California and everything east of I-35. As an example, the Midwest has roughly the same population as France, and the TGV network overlaid kind of lines up with major population centers. https://pedestrianobservations.com/2021/04/04/european-urbanism-and-high-speed-rail/ https://pedestrianobservations.com/2021/04/04/european-urban...