3 ms·
How can we be talking past each other when you got exactly what I said? You just disagree with me that non profits exists, that cooperatives exists, that emplo
by insert_coin 5y ago
How can we be talking past each other when you got exactly what I said? You just disagree with me that non profits exists, that cooperatives exists, that employee owned businesses exist, that communions and communities where profit is not a word in their lexicon exist.
But they exists. And not only that, the number of self employed people that share all or some of those values grows every year.
And if all that isn’t enough, there are countries much less imperialistic that would have no trouble letting you in.
Cold corporate jobs are not the only jobs and have never been.
- jim-jim-jim 5y agoWe might've been talking past each other when you said > Sadly for some their only purpose at work is to cause division Your implication is that disruption is taking place over issues of workers' rights or anti-imperialism. It isn't for the most part. Those matters pit the company against its workers. The brand of hostility covered in the article is worker-on-worker, and often occurs with the implicit blessing of the company itself. My only intent was to draw a distinction, since the latter situation was disingenuously dubbed "progressive activism."