4 ms·
Don't know why this is getting upvoted as it contains a bunch of factual errors. It's definitely being used as a currency already, as the article proves. It's
by niklas_a 15y ago
Don't know why this is getting upvoted as it contains a bunch of factual errors.
It's definitely being used as a currency already, as the article proves.
It's a highly fluctuating currency, but that doesn't remove it's properties as a currency.
- zppx 15y agoCare to explain the errors? People tends to vote on divisive issues in whichever post they agree. Although not perfect and not entering in details, maybe because of generalization, I found his explanation resonating with what I know about monetary history, but I'm not a monetary economist.