There is no evidence that article implies the workplace, or even society at large, is divided between those who 'support negative discrimination' and those who

There is no evidence that article implies the workplace, or even society at large, is divided between those who 'support negative discrimination' and those who don't. The very presumption of this is a kind of a problematic radicalism. Almost everyone wants people to be treated fairly and with dignity, it's just the 'equity' types think that is still a problem, and that other things should be done. Paradoxically, it is the '13%' who want us to use race, gender and other artifacts as primary elements of professional identity for hiring, promotion, delegation etc.. Edit: I should add, I don't have a problem with the 13% view that they think they should 'do more'. I'm 'part' of the 13% in that sense. What I'm (very) against is the intolerance and absolution that anyone who doesn't share their agenda is problematic, immoral etc..