2 ms·
So, the longer complaint alleges that not only did Nestle take twice as much as they were theoretically allowed from specific sources, they also took a signific
by ac29 6y ago
So, the longer complaint alleges that not only did Nestle take twice as much as they were theoretically allowed from specific sources, they also took a significant amount from sources from which they were not authorized to take anything (at least according to the State).
I dont see the the exact 58 million gallons number, which apparently refers to a specific year, but on page 12 it says "The average annual extraction was 189 AF from 1947 through 2018", which is ~61 million gallons.
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/programs/enforcement/complaints/docs/nestle/4_23_2021_nestle_roi.pdf https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/waterrights/water_issues/prog...