4 ms·
I am sometimes curious why people kept talking about a "dying" thing rather just letting it die quietly. Does it imply an underlying sentiment that we all hope
by izgzhen 5y ago
I am sometimes curious why people kept talking about a "dying" thing rather just letting it die quietly. Does it imply an underlying sentiment that we all hope someday there is a UML alternative that is truly successful?
- jeltz 5y agoNo, but I think a relatively small minority of software developers hope so. And those keep writing these articles.
- bccdee 5y agoMaybe. Personally, I see it as a celebration. I'm not fond of UML and I'm glad to dance on its grave.
- kstrauser 5y agoFor anyone having a hard time imagining that: know that I’ll buy a round of drinks the day that Internet Explorer is officially dead.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- pjmlp 5y agoNo, if we consider UML a visual programming language, there are the languages that everyone hates and those that no one uses. I consider these UML hate articles as valuable as those anti-OOP ones, while all OS GUIs and mainstream languages have some kind of OOP support in them.
- ngcc_hk 5y agoA: You di not know how many years we spent on training on that. Always thinking great may be, but let us talk something we can manipulate and explain to the users. Then hq continued our training. Go to A: