No, really, that's not a Republican perspective at all. In fact, the Republican perspective is the opposite; that government-provided options will be invariabl

No, really, that's not a Republican perspective at all. In fact, the Republican perspective is the opposite; that government-provided options will be invariably be worse value for money - this is why Republicans favor privatization. I think the Republican objection is to general revenues being used to operated a subsidized Internet service. If that is what you mean by "government-supported", then there is a reasonable argument to be had about whether forcing everyone to pay for the municipal option through taxes really results in a fair competitive landscape for private providers.