I'm a moderate AI Dungeon user, including some NSFW content. Frankly, I've always assumed the devs have access to my sessions. Whether it's AI Dungeon themsel

I'm a moderate AI Dungeon user, including some NSFW content. Frankly, I've always assumed the devs have access to my sessions. Whether it's AI Dungeon themselves or OpenAI, you know that data is being harvested. And at this juncture in text AI development, that kinda makes sense. Obviously I would prefer privacy where possible, but these companies are data hungry and they own the park we're playing in. So it only seems fair. We'll have to wait awhile for GPT-3 like models to democratize before we can expect real privacy. In the meantime, just err on the side of assuming all input to OpenAI systems is being harvested. > and early anecdotal reports are, it is painfully crude, both oversensitive and underspecific Funnily enough, I didn't run into any issues with any of my NSFW sessions since they implemented the filters. So I guess the problems are with SFW sessions so far :P Anyway, I've got to say I'm kinda happy about AI Dungeon tackling this problem. They made it clear in their announcement that they aren't targeting NSFW content in general, just the one subject. The AI has a tendency of shoving that subject randomly into sessions, which isn't great. If they can eventually filter that filth out without affecting quality otherwise, I think the service will be better for it.