3 ms·
> introduce fact claims I'm sure everyone would agree that people have eyes and phones and that a phone can take pictures. Why is that a fact claim? Just show
by dheera 6y ago
> introduce fact claims
I'm sure everyone would agree that people have eyes and phones and that a phone can take pictures. Why is that a fact claim? Just show the pictures. And then ask real questions, like "what do you see" "oh look someone's knee on someone's neck". I hate inefficiency.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> I'm sure everyone would agree that people have eyes and phones and that a phone can take pictures. Why is that a fact claim? Just show the pictures. Every single one of those questions is establishing a fact in the record without which the opposing counsel would potentially have grounds to object to the presentation of the pictures. You can’t just show pictures without an explanation through facts themselves introduced as evidence, whether by testimony or otherwise, unless freely stipulated by the opposing party, of what the evidence is, where it came from, and why it is relevant. Again, yeah, it makes crappy theater. The rules are about due process for the parties in a case, not keeping the proceedings engaging for an audience.
- dheera 6y agoTo what extent does that go? Why don't they ask: "Humans have legs right?" "And how many legs do you have?" "And legs can be used for locomotion right?" "And you used those legs to translate your body to the location of the mobile phone right?" "Oh yeah, you have a body, right? I forgot to ask" "And there are these appendages called arms right?" "How many arms do you have?"
- anigbrowl 6y agoBook suggestion: Adversarial Legalism by Robert Kagan.