Premise 1: Musk has an advantage in the markets Premise 2: No company that Musk is not involved with could gain a competitive advantage via the signal they sen

Premise 1: Musk has an advantage in the markets Premise 2: No company that Musk is not involved with could gain a competitive advantage via the signal they send with a bitcoin purchase. Premise 1 and premise 2 have no relationship. Stating something about one does not tell you anything about the other. You could logically believe any combination of these premises So by stating 1, I'm not implying 2. In fact I'm agreeing with 1 and refuting 2. Whereas you seem to be implying that if I believe 1 I have to believe 2. This is not the case.