4 ms·
Zoom out a bit, maybe look at 1602 to the present and ask, "What can and can't be property, who decides what is and isn't property, am I ok with this, and why a
by aaron-santos 5y ago
Zoom out a bit, maybe look at 1602 to the present and ask, "What can and can't be property, who decides what is and isn't property, am I ok with this, and why am I ok with this?" What are the second and third order effects that result from first principles here?
- beervirus 5y agoYou're making a normative argument about what should be property. I'm making a purely descriptive point.
- aaron-santos 5y agoYes, I understood this when I replied. Thank you.
- beervirus 5y agoSo you were intentionally pretending to misunderstand? Cool.
- aaron-santos 5y agoNo I was not. Hope you have a good rest of your day.