4 ms·
I think the whole user choice problem is a bit overblown when it comes to Ubuntu. The whole idea of Ubuntu was and is "linux for humans", not "linux for everybo
by programminggeek 15y ago
I think the whole user choice problem is a bit overblown when it comes to Ubuntu. The whole idea of Ubuntu was and is "linux for humans", not "linux for everybody".
Ubuntu's default was Gnome 2 for a good long time, but I think the switch to Unity is the right direction. If you don't like it there are tons of distros out there that still support Gnome 2, Gnome 3, KDE, and so on.
In fact, Ubuntu has had a separate KDE, XFCE, and even MythTV version for a while. I wouldn't be surprised if there is a Gnome Ubuntu coming from the community when the official UI is Unity only.
In the end, the people who care are nerds who know enough to run a different distro or install Gnome 2 or 3 in Ubuntu themselves. The real change here is for the average user who doesn't care.
- drivebyacct2 15y ago??? Even the even-keel replies act as if you can't use GNOME 2, 3 or KDE in Ubuntu. It's completely absurd! I currently have one gnome-panel, with Cardapio and the wonderful, welcome app-indicators. With Docky/Plank depending on my mood. This has worked in all versions and will continue to work in basically any version of Ubuntu. 11.10 will support GNOME 3, fallback mode and a classic session in addition to Unity. Gnome-shell is a tiny apt-get away. So can we stop acting like No Unity = No Ubuntu?