This is a placeholder for substantive commentary about the article contents... ...rather than complaints about Natty Geo's business model (and asking for an em

This is a placeholder for substantive commentary about the article contents... ...rather than complaints about Natty Geo's business model (and asking for an email address). The latter complaints are obvious and uninteresting, and are not unique to Natty Geo. I'm not categorically against such commentary, but it is not useful if they dominate the commentary here. The former is interesting because it is relevant to the -content- of the article -- or the underling study if you prefer to read that. https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/17/2/561/594550/Suprasubduction-zone-ophiolite-fragments-in-the https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article/17/2/...