4 ms·
> "How much energy can we get out of a plot of land of a given size?" I don't believe this is an answerable question in this format. The size of a plot says no
by kempbellt 5y ago
> "How much energy can we get out of a plot of land of a given size?"
I don't believe this is an answerable question in this format. The size of a plot says nothing of land topography, nor the average wind currents for any given timeframe.
Wind farms are great tech, but adequate calculation of efficiency and cost/benefit is always subjective to individual installations. Solar farm efficiency calculations are easier because the variables at play are much more consistent. Essentially: panel efficiency * sun exposure * array size. I don't believe this formula translates to wind farms.
Finding a more efficient design for wind-to-energy conversion is a lot like making an improvement in the "panel efficiency" part of solar arrays. Or maybe wind has an "array design" variable to consider since one turbine's design can affect the wind energy capacity of another. This isn't the same for solar, unless panels overlap during certain times of the day.
- mumblemumble 5y agoYeah, that's more or less what I was getting at, albeit in less detail. Put topography and how it interacts with the wind and all of that under the category of "mechanics", I guess? But, in the simulation that this study is based on, it looked to me like they assumed flat terrain and laminar airflow coming into the field of turbines. Which I'm assuming happens in nature approximately never. So it's like, sure, maybe this turbine arrangement can get 15% greater power output under ideal conditions, but I don't think you can get from there to, "this is a clear win over the incumbent technology" anywhere near as easily as you could in the case of an photovoltaic efficiency improvement.