3 ms·
No no, that's not what I meant at all. I meant print debugging can't replace the debugger. Of course a debugger can't replace the need for logs entirely!
by amarant 6y ago
No no, that's not what I meant at all. I meant print debugging can't replace the debugger.
Of course a debugger can't replace the need for logs entirely!
- simiones 6y agoOh, then we are agreed! The article is in fact claiming that a debugger can replace print debugging entirely, that's why I read your comment in this same vein.