3 ms·
That makes total sense, thanks for the feedback. Is there anything besides wide adoption that you think might help bridge the trust gap?
by ZECTBynmo 5y ago
That makes total sense, thanks for the feedback. Is there anything besides wide adoption that you think might help bridge the trust gap?
- ramimac 5y agoIt's a hard problem - and depends on your target market. That being said, in my experience most companies with the maturity to go hunting for a tool like this will also have established vendor security requirements. On a baseline "trust" level - having an identity associated with the project beyond a new "brand" can help bridge that gap, especially if there are folks with strong personal reputations attached. On the product side, https://www.enterpriseready.io/ https://www.enterpriseready.io/ does a good job breaking down expectations for SaaS (https://www.enterpriseready.io/features/product-security/ https://www.enterpriseready.io/features/product-security/). In the long term, you'll find many of the largest possible customers will demand an on-prem option, and/or some level of external attestation (e.g. a pentest, SOC2, etc.) I acknowledge this is a lot to throw at someone getting a product going, and don't want to be discouraging, but security products have an even larger expectation - especially because I expect your buyer and user personas to be security-centric