Well entanglement very much is the interesting part, as it is with any hidden variable theory. This version is disapointingly shallow though: >It is also a na

Well entanglement very much is the interesting part, as it is with any hidden variable theory. This version is disapointingly shallow though: >It is also a natural result of a peer-to-peer network that single objects can “split in two”, becoming entangled He does describe a process whereby an object can split into two, but as for how this is the same as two entangled particles I've no clue. Just sounds like superposition to me to be honest.