4 ms·

You should read the original text pasted in DHH's post. I read it twice and I have no clue how the text can be described as such, or prompt a visit to HR.

• mempko 6y ago
  And yet there was a prompt visit to HR. The text is also clearly redacted, so we actually don't know what the original said.
  • malwarebytess 6y ago
    Yes, because the histrionic employee decided to do it. HR, external lawyers, dismissed it. Having read the letter they reported it's clear the employee is fucking nuts.
    • mempko 6y ago
      Cui bono. Who does HR and external lawyers serve?
      • sokoloff 6y ago
        In general, they serve the company but not necessarily the human leaders inside the company. Plenty a CEO, even a founder, has been shown the door (when justified) after investigations like this.