1. Mandate that each accused has the right to view the evidence against them - this means no bans without specific evidence that the user can view and defend ag

1. Mandate that each accused has the right to view the evidence against them - this means no bans without specific evidence that the user can view and defend against. 2. Mandate that each accused has the right to face their accuser - this means each ban must provide a way to speak to a person via phone and email to appeal it. 3. Mandate that each accused has a right to a fair trial - this means that, at some point in the appeals process, the banned must have the option of, with minimal investment of time and effort, being judged by a neutral party, which has the power to ultimately overturn judgements by the non-neutral party (Facebook) The problem isn't that there are no solutions - each of these three totally reasonable rights was conceived of centuries ago. The problem is that Google doesn't want to do them because it is at least 1 cent cheaper to _not_ do then.