4 ms·
IMO, currently there is no such a thing as intelligence in all AI approaches. By saying that I don't mean they are not useful, but rather saying that to me seem
by mrjin 6y ago
IMO, currently there is no such a thing as intelligence in all AI approaches. By saying that I don't mean they are not useful, but rather saying that to me seems all so called AI model are based on statistics and for sure those programs are way better and/or faster than human in finding subtle common factors in some given datasets. But being able to resolve some hard problems does not mean they are intelligence as they simply cannot understand the problem(s). And thus they might be able to give out correct response on par or better than human in normal conditions but give wrong or even absurd responses when minor noises which human cannot even detect involved.
- carschno 6y agoOne essential point about this philosophical branch of AI research is to investigate where "intelligence" and "understanding" really begin. Saying "the computer does not understand and thus is not intelligent" is a valid, but mundane belief, ignoring that entire research branch with its many unknowns and open questions.
- ryandvm 6y agoThat's why it's called "artificial intelligence". Once we've cracked general intelligence, which is seemingly just an emergent property of sufficiently complex information processing, it won't be "artificial" anymore. It'll just be intelligence.
- simonh 6y agoI've heard this "just an emergent property" theory before, but I don't get it. What evidence of this do we have of this? It seems like we make complex information processing system all the time, and the more complex they are the more fragile they are. Even the tiniest thing going wrong sends the whole system into chaos or a dead stall. Thermodynamics teaches us that order, and intelligence is largely about imposing order, takes a huge amount of work and is inherently unstable.