3 ms·
> If they lose that leverage we as Apple users will lose these benefits, and for what? Because you literally don't get people in autocratic regimes killed beca
by Mindwipe 6y ago
> If they lose that leverage we as Apple users will lose these benefits, and for what?
Because you literally don't get people in autocratic regimes killed because the single choke point of software that might enable them to escape detection is removed. Because you remove Apple's rampant discrimination against some kinds of speech and the people that effects. Because Apple attacks businesses with any involvement in sex whatsoever.
- frusciante19 6y agoSo you're ok with children being able to buy porn mags in the same store they can buy sweets, but you're not ok with Apple controlling what bad actors might sell in the app store?
- cdogl 6y agoI agree with your points about sex workers and speech about sex in general, but your comments about people in autocratic regimes ring a little hyperbolic. Chinese [1] users were able to use Signal until the Chinese state seemed to block it at the network layer. WhatsApp is blocked too. That's unfortunate, but what's Apple got to do with it? And what exactly could they do to prevent it that the state wouldn't get in the way of? [1] I'm assuming that "autocratic" here refers to China - though despite the lack of political freedom and the awful situation with regard to ethnic minorities, I don't think that's a very helpful or expressive label.
- fossuser 6y ago> “ Because you literally don't get people in autocratic regimes killed because the single choke point of software that might enable them to escape detection is removed.” If anything, Apple’s control here enables better protection for users. You think authoritarian regimes don’t own phones? You think Android is safer in China?