3 ms·
You make a better argument than the article, but the implications are that you'd shift charitable activity from the private sector to government. That's not ne
by jacknews 6y ago
You make a better argument than the article, but the implications are that you'd shift charitable activity from the private sector to government.
That's not necessarily bad, but having a diversity of aid organizations is better, imho.
- bradleyjg 6y agoWhat you’d lose in diversity, you’d gain in focus. They are flip sides of the same coin. Some donor thinks a museum of modern architecture is charitable, which is fine but I don’t want tax money diverted to that.