4 ms·
Unless the author is not only a scientist but a really good one, I cannot personally believe any of this material. If particles were as essential to health as
by cubicmeter 5y ago
Unless the author is not only a scientist but a really good one, I cannot personally believe any of this material.
If particles were as essential to health as claimed, smokers would have a much much shorter life expectancy.
- datlife 5y agoAgree. S/he is selling air filters, so the intention is obvious to me here. Anyways, it's an interesting read but I'll take it with a grain of salt.
- ac29 5y agoI dont see any evidence they are selling anything. No links, or even names of products on the various pages about air filters.
- briefcomment 5y agoFrom another comment thread > It's not just about life expectancy, but life quality. I think we'll one day be surprised just how many mental health and chronic illnesses are significantly attributable to air pollution, in all its forms.
- MattGaiser 5y ago> Life expectancy for smokers is at least 10 years shorter than for nonsmokers. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/health_effects/tobacco_related_mortality/index.htm#:~:text=Cigarette%20smoking%20causes%20premature%20death,years%20shorter%20than%20for%20nonsmokers.&text=Quitting%20smoking%20before%20the%20age,related%20disease%20by%20about%2090%25 https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/heal....
- rantwasp 5y agolol. smoking reduces your life expectancy by 15% on average.