> So you're arguing that diversity of background (age, previous career, class) is more useful diversity than ethnicity/race? That isn't at all what the comment

> So you're arguing that diversity of background (age, previous career, class) is more useful diversity than ethnicity/race? That isn't at all what the commenter argued. They argued that diversity in ethnicity/race is not the same as diversity in background. The commenter did not provide a superlative or other qualifier.