3 ms·
> They'll flip the nanosecond it suits them. Like when Apple dropped end-to-end encryption on iCloud because FBI asked them politely. https://www.reuters.com/
by hu3 6y ago
> They'll flip the nanosecond it suits them.
Like when Apple dropped end-to-end encryption on iCloud because FBI asked them politely.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusive-idUSKBN1ZK1CT https://www.reuters.com/article/us-apple-fbi-icloud-exclusiv...
- meepmorp 6y agohttps://blog.elcomsoft.com/2021/01/apple-fbi-and-iphone-backup-encryption-everything-you-wanted-to-know/ https://blog.elcomsoft.com/2021/01/apple-fbi-and-iphone-back...
- hu3 6y ago"The encryption keys are stored at Apple’ own servers" Thanks for confirming that there's no privacy in iCloud.
- meepmorp 6y agoYou should actually read the article, perhaps after first setting down the axe you're grinding. The details are interesting, and they discuss the Reuters piece you linked to.
- hu3 6y agoI did read the article. It nitpicks on Reuters article but the point still stands. Apple has the keys to iCloud backups. There's no axe to grind because the lack of end-to-end encryption is a fact. Your own link states that. Nitpicking Reuters won't change that. I don't understand this mentality of religiously defending something that's clearly wrong. It will only make the platform you use worse. By the way you should read HN guidelines. Don't comment whether someone read an article. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html