>no, for explicitly damaging a business. politics and drama don't contribute to a productive work environment. I mean, that's the point of inclusivity, margina

>no, for explicitly damaging a business. politics and drama don't contribute to a productive work environment. I mean, that's the point of inclusivity, marginalized people just want to be able to do their jobs and avoid politics and drama. But it's hard to do that when they're being marginalized. >if they would help business, they wouldn't be needed because businesses would implement them as corporate policy on their own. A lot of them do. Small companies don't have resources to come up with extensive policies so that's where the laws become helpful. >I'm indeed shaming activists who promote violence or similar b/s (ie. punch a nazi, or BLM rioters, ...) for not being normal acting. Would you describe them as normal acting? [...] Again I'm not talking about people advocating for fairness. SJWs are troublemakes, not advocates. These comments are exactly why I say the term is emotionally loaded and you should avoid using that term, please don't draw false equivalences to attack stereotypes and claim that everyone who advocates for justice is troublemaking and promoting violence. You might not mean to do that but that's what you're doing when you use those derogatory terms in that way. This is getting really close to flamewar territory again and I don't want to continue this conversation.