4 ms·
I have wished for a system like this forever. I have no qualms over a test. We all need to take tests. Give all applicants a few written tests on the job the
by hellbannedguy 5y ago
I have wished for a system like this forever.
I have no qualms over a test. We all need to take tests.
Give all applicants a few written tests on the job they are hiring for.
The people who do well on the test are given the job on a probationary basis.
I might even exclude references, and schooling?
- rsa25519 5y ago> The people who do well on the test are given the job on a probationary basis. This sounds terrible. Not everyone can take tests well (even if they strongly understand the content), and few people can afford to accept a job that's probationary.
- njarboe 5y agoIn the US at least, at-will employment means that all jobs are "probationary".
- Enginerrrd 5y agoI've met plenty of average people / mediocre performers that probably test worse than their other performance, but I've never met an exceptional performer that was a poor tester. I have met some exceptional testers that were poor performers due to personality issues. Tests have issues, but in general, the statement: "if you're a "bad tester" you're not an excellent performer" is pretty true. The caveat being that, IMO, most of the time, institutions are using the wrong test.