3 ms·
‘New users would be best served by a "commit" variant that simply updated the HEAD commit in place.’ Isn’t this what `git commit -a` does? Or do I misunderstan
by leephillips 6y ago
‘New users would be best served by a "commit" variant that simply updated the HEAD commit in place.’
Isn’t this what `git commit -a` does? Or do I misunderstand?
- gmueckl 6y agoThe article already contains an eloquent critique of this option: its semantics are too broad and inflexible to cover that use case.
- sixstringtheory 6y agoHmm, I wonder if GP meant `git commit --amend` which is not the same as `git commit -a` (`git commit --all`)?