5 ms·

I guess the unintended consequence of outlawing internal political discussions is that those discussions then become external...

• chroma 6y ago
  I am very much in favor of making political discussions external. It lets me see who the activists are so I can avoid hiring them.
  • deleted 6y ago
    [deleted]
  • etxm 6y ago
    The only thing that makes you sound like more of an asshole than this comment is that you actually have an anonymous account to be an asshole because you’re afraid of being recognized as an asshole (see this accounts bio). Just be an asshole if you want to be an asshole.
    • chroma 6y ago
      I wish I didn't have to use a pseudonym but you've shown why it's necessary. If I used my real name, is there any doubt that people such as yourself would try to ruin my life? I don't want to get anyone fired from their job or harassed by a mob outside their home. I simply don't want to hire them. The real assholes are the ones who proselytize their dogmas in the workplace. I wouldn't hire a devout Catholic who'd tried to convert coworkers at a previous job. The same goes for a Trump supporter who'd pushed their employer to donate to the NRA. Nor would I hire an activist who wants to un-blind resumes so that hiring can discriminate based on race and sex. I don't hire these people for a simple reason: No matter how good they are at their job, they cause more problems than they're worth.
      • etxm 6y ago
        Yes, I’m here to ruin your life. Not a hyperbolic statement at all, much like your definition of “activists.”