3 ms·
I don't think more data than fits in memory is a requirement. An important innovation in databases has been the realization that there are important performance
by slaymaker1907 5y ago
I don't think more data than fits in memory is a requirement. An important innovation in databases has been the realization that there are important performance benefits from assuming all data can fit in memory even if you still provide persistence.
Even persistence isn't really required. A pure analytics view of another database is still a database by itself, but it doesn't need to actually persist anything. It seems like querying is more important to the concept of a database rather than actual storage.
- tyingq 5y agoI wasn't suggesting they had to, or should happen. Just trying to understand the future plans since the "DB" term is there.