Whatever their reasons may be, they may be legitimate. But using this sentence is simply not OK: > Because this information could be used to circumvent our pr

Whatever their reasons may be, they may be legitimate. But using this sentence is simply not OK: > Because this information could be used to circumvent our proprietary detection system, we’re unable to provide our publishers with information about specific account activity. The developer/publisher must be given a chance to correct the issues. This is simply not fair. I'm pretty sure Google can do better than to rely on security by obscurity. --- > Unfortunately we also have to inform our users that we could no longer support AdMob for use in their own apps either, because we can't test it anymore and can't guarantee that Google won't treat them in the same brutal way. Couldn't it be possible that one of those users was using AdMob in a fraudulent way, and that this was then linked to Droidscript? I don't know how Droidscript works, how it creates those apps, but it could be possible that Droidscript then was responsible for the fraudulent use a user did.