4 ms·
>Actual professionals, [that is, doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers (real ones, not the phony software kind)] have obligations to their professional stand
by Hitton 5y ago
>Actual professionals, [that is, doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers (real ones, not the phony software kind)] have obligations to their professional standards and ethics that supersede obligations to their employer.
That's incredibly naive world view. Doctors are constantly letting themselves be bribed by pharma companies (let alone "ethics" that allow them committing things like Tuskegee experiment, forced sterilizations or stuff like [0]) and lawyers are regarded as biggest liars for a reason (and not only defence or civil law lawyers, we keep constantly hearing about prosecutorial misconduct). And it's not like they get shunned by their peers when caught usually they get only slap on the wrist, they don't even have to turn in their license or get disbarred.
[0]: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/05/14/pelvic-exams-on-anesthetized-women-without-consent-a-troubling-and-outdated-practice/?sh=3a9fce078462 https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulhsieh/2018/05/14/pelvic-exa...
- ForHackernews 5y agoSome people fail to uphold the ethical standards of their profession, therefore we shouldn't have ethical standards? Is that the argument here?
- Hitton 5y agoOh, we should have them. But despite all their education (which includes ethics) and professional associations, your revered "professionals" aren't any better than the "wage labourers".
- HarryHirsch 5y agoThey absolutely are. The very first question asked by any lawyer is "who is the other party". Lawyers are very aware of conflict of interest.