The article does address the two points you mention, and also addresses contractual arguments and examples. > Argue your point as best you can and hope! This

The article does address the two points you mention, and also addresses contractual arguments and examples. > Argue your point as best you can and hope! This sounds like a recipe for distress. Isn't the utility of the idea that whatever argument you face, whatever tort or contract or criminal allegation you are fighting for, your best will be better if you understand the logical premise of the argument and the way it is carried forward?