I had the impression it was logic until the point where people talked about a priory stuff. Like, yes, you're guilty of X if you did A, B, and C. Lawyers then

I had the impression it was logic until the point where people talked about a priory stuff. Like, yes, you're guilty of X if you did A, B, and C. Lawyers then argue if it was really A and B and C. Was it really with intention etc. Since the arguing parties weren't at the crime scene when it happened, they have quite a bit of wiggle room.