4 ms·
> Marriage was a religious thing Do you have sources to back that up? I'm genuinely curious. My understanding was that marriage was always a social contract, b
by ck425 5y ago
> Marriage was a religious thing
Do you have sources to back that up? I'm genuinely curious. My understanding was that marriage was always a social contract, but that society and religion used to be more intertwined thus 'religious marriage'.
I don't disagree with the idea of separating the religious and civil/cultural aspects of marriage. But I think you'll find non religious folk resistant to calling civil/cultural partnerships something other than marriage. It's a deeply embedded cultural concept not just a religious concept.
- skinkestek 5y agoI guess you are right, in some places it might have been purely cultural. That said I think my argument still stands if you replace "religious" with "cultural"?