6 ms·
Not to bring you down, but to let anyone else know, this isn't novel and has been standard practice for a decade or so.
by stedaniels 5y ago
Not to bring you down, but to let anyone else know, this isn't novel and has been standard practice for a decade or so.
- elaus 5y agoThe technique as it isn't new of course, but I doubt this specific implementation (checking for module-supporting JS) is standard practice for a decade.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- greggturkington 5y agoThis doesn't check for "module-supporting JS" > [not] for a decade Agreed, probably longer. How old is Modernizr?
- weird-eye-issue 5y agoWell you're wrong because it does check that it supports modules. Go look at it more closely.
- _0o6v 5y agoNo it hasn't
- dt3ft 5y ago> “To let everyone know, this is not novel” Who asked?
- RONROC 5y ago“Not to bring you down, and not adding anything useful here, but...”
- nsonha 5y agoIt is kind of useful. I'm trained to feel dubious of anything newly invented if the underlying elements of the solution have been there for 2 decades (there must be some reason people didnt do it that way then). If this is existing practice then it sounds right.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- acdha 5y agoIt’s not novel but consider how unproductive your attitude is. Someone was excited about learning something new, and you took a massive dump all over it, with no benefit whatsoever. If you’re upset that not everyone knows everything, you should be working to cultivate that excitement! https://xkcd.com/1053/ https://xkcd.com/1053/