> You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant factor of race. I substituted one protected class for another, where it's

> You have successfully obscured the issue even further by introducing the irrelevant factor of race. I substituted one protected class for another, where it's more commonly seen as a necessary protected class. This is a pretty common device to illustrate bias in language. Are you arguing that it's fine to make your statement about a generation, but not about a race? If so, why?