3 ms·

Why should the people at Moderna be punished with high taxes when they're the ones that have come up with a life-saving vaccine that's bringing a global pandemi

Why should the people at Moderna be punished with high taxes when they're the ones that have come up with a life-saving vaccine that's bringing a global pandemic to an end? Why not go all the way? There are people with physical or mental disabilities who contribute little of economic value to society. Whatever money these disabled people manage to scrape together, we should tax the shit out of it. /s My more sincere answer is: a dollar means less to someone who already has a million than to someone who wound up sleeping on a park bench. Well, it should mean less, at any rate.

maxharris 5y ago
I don't think you understood my comment. Minimizing public spending and government control over our lives is a noble goal. As things stand now, we are headed for hyperinflation, which will be followed by a terrible collapse, akin to the one that happened in Weimar Germany in the 1920s. What comes after that isn't pretty, because we've seen that movie before, a century ago in Europe... Right now the majority of voters, left-wing and right-wing alike, are perfectly fine with unsustainable public spending. They vote for things they expect others to pay for, and that's contributing to our downfall.
- uniqueid 5y ago
  I didn't pick up that that was the thrust of the original comment. I don't have strong feelings about government control, of itself. If the government that controls my life is Denmark's, no problem. If it's North Korea's, no thanks.
- Arnt 5y ago
  The classic answer to your question is that if income tax is flat, then overall taxation is degressive, which most people consider unfair. There are taxes (and comparable unavoidable/imposed costs) related to many expenses. VAT is often mentioned, but is far from the only one. People with low income need to spend a higher fraction of their income than people whose income allows more saving, and thus pay more VAT viewed as a share of their income. There are many others. Schooling is mandatory in most countries and generally involves a cost per child imposed on the parents (because the public financing never covers 100% of the school's needs), so the costs imposed by the state as fraction of the parents' income is degressive. BTW, regarding that "unsustainable public spending"... if the interest rate the state pays is stable and low, then what makes the borrowing unsustainable? Surely the lenders' judgment of state finances is the one that matters.

maxharris 5y ago

I don't think you understood my comment. Minimizing public spending and government control over our lives is a noble goal. As things stand now, we are headed for hyperinflation, which will be followed by a terrible collapse, akin to the one that happened in Weimar Germany in the 1920s. What comes after that isn't pretty, because we've seen that movie before, a century ago in Europe... Right now the majority of voters, left-wing and right-wing alike, are perfectly fine with unsustainable public spending. They vote for things they expect others to pay for, and that's contributing to our downfall.

uniqueid 5y ago
I didn't pick up that that was the thrust of the original comment. I don't have strong feelings about government control, of itself. If the government that controls my life is Denmark's, no problem. If it's North Korea's, no thanks.
Arnt 5y ago
The classic answer to your question is that if income tax is flat, then overall taxation is degressive, which most people consider unfair. There are taxes (and comparable unavoidable/imposed costs) related to many expenses. VAT is often mentioned, but is far from the only one. People with low income need to spend a higher fraction of their income than people whose income allows more saving, and thus pay more VAT viewed as a share of their income. There are many others. Schooling is mandatory in most countries and generally involves a cost per child imposed on the parents (because the public financing never covers 100% of the school's needs), so the costs imposed by the state as fraction of the parents' income is degressive. BTW, regarding that "unsustainable public spending"... if the interest rate the state pays is stable and low, then what makes the borrowing unsustainable? Surely the lenders' judgment of state finances is the one that matters.